Monday, July 4, 2011

images %IMG_DESC_8% . %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • nkavjs
    09-25 09:45 AM
    Type in congressman your city name in google or yahoo search. It will give you various names for your senator and congressmen. Call them and give them your name FN LN, DOB, Alien number and fedex / delivery tracking mnumber. They will call you back with relevant information.
    Goodluck

    this is a draft I used to email my inquiries. Hope this helps.
    ------------------

    Regarding: Inquiry/status for I-485 AOS application sent to USCIS, Nebraska Service Center on July 2nd 2007 [FedEx Tracking No. xxxx - Recd. by Mr. J. Barrett NSC At 10.25am on July 2nd]

    Dear Mr. Assistant Chief,

    My Adjustment of status application [I-485,I-765 and I-131] based on EB3 RIR category, was delivered to Department of Homeland Security, USCIS, Nebraska Service Center, Lincoln, NE on July 2nd 2007. It was received in the mailroom at 10.25am (reference : FedEx tracking number xxxxx).

    USCIS website says NSC are working with August 2007 received AOS applications. However, I haven't heard any sort of communication pertaining to my pending application with USCIS. USCIS Customer Service would not pull up my application information in the system yet. Seems like USCIS is either not following the First in First out (FIFO) process for sure or the figures are misleading.

    Details as provided below:

    Name of Applicant: Name xxx
    �A� Number of Applicant: A 088 xxx xxx
    Date of Birth: xxx
    FedEx Tracking No: (whatever is your tracking number)

    I would greatly appreciate if your office can help me to track and process my AOS application delivered to NSC on July 2nd 2007. Please feel free to contact me at (xxx) xxxx for any additional information.


    Thanks and Best Regards,





    wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1% . %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • singhsa3
    08-06 08:13 PM
    Where will this road take us?





    . %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • spouse485
    01-24 12:18 PM
    We are travelling next month and our travel agent wisely suggested and booked tickets for us via frankfurt by air india. He knows that london is a problem especially when you are coming back on AP.

    After reading thru the painful story of milind, I feel that I should never go thru london.

    Thanks a lot for sharing your pain. What if I wish to travel through Germany/Netherlands/Swiss/France/UAE? on Advance Parole and if my H type visa is not valid anymore?





    2011 %IMG_DESC_2% . %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • asanghi
    05-16 01:36 PM
    Do you have F1 stamped or you just changed your status from F-1 to H-4?


    My wife has H4 stamped on her passport which expired last year. We had got H4 extended last year, but has not been stamped. After that she changed status to F1 again not stamped. Now as per my lawyer's advice probably we will need to change her status back to H4.

    My lawyer has suggested that it is not advisable to be on F-1 while applying for 485. You might argue that you are not the primary applicant ( on F1), and USCIS might buy that. But risks remain. Specifically if you have to travel out of country before your I-485 application is adjudicated you will have problem.

    Since we all know that right now USCIS is just taking applications, and it might be mighty long time before applications are adjudicated, I have decided to not take risk applying on F1 status.



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • pappu
    01-07 07:11 PM
    LETTER TEMPLATE #2

    <<Date>>

    The Honorable George W. Bush
    President of the United States
    The White House
    1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
    Washington, DC 20500


    Dear Mr. President:

    I write today to urge you to fix America's broken legal employment-based immigration system. Currently, more than 500,000 skilled individuals who contribute to the American economy through their hard work in high technology, scientific research, medicine and other fields find themselves trapped in a process that is hopelessly backlogged.

    If nothing is done, hundreds of thousands of immigrants will wait years or even decades in a process that was never intended to take so long. While comprehensive change will require legislative action, your administration can implement administrative remedies to improve America's competitiveness, eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies, and improve the quality of life for these legal, highly-skilled immigrants.

    Sir, I came to the United States of America <<NUMBER>> years back. I graduated from <<UNIVERSITY>> with a Masters in <<FIELD>> and I have a Bachelor’s in <<FIELD>> from <<UNIVERSITY>>. After completing my Masters, I started working for <<COMPANY>> in <<YEAR>>. I am currently working as a <<POSITION>> with <<COMPANY>>. While in many respects I live the American dream of participating in a thriving economy, the dream is still incomplete because under the work visa provisions my wife of <<NUMBER>> years cannot work inspite of having a <<QUALIFICATION>>. Many people I know are contemplating moving to other economies of the world to take advantage of a fairer immigration policy. In other circles I am also aware of developing nations trying to lure back their citizens to boost their Research and Development potential.

    Attracting and retaining the best and brightest minds from around the world is in America's best interest. In February 2006, your Domestic Policy Council issued a report on the American Competitiveness Initiative that recognized the importance of employment-based immigration. The report stated: "The President also recognizes that enabling the world's most talented and hardest-working individuals to put their skills to work for America will increase our entrepreneurship and our international competitiveness, and will net many high-paying jobs for all Americans. The United States benefits from our ability to attract and retain needed immigrant and non-immigrant students and workers, and it is important that America remains competitive in attracting talented foreign nationals."

    You can advance your stated objective by making common-sense administrative reforms to fix a system that is clearly broken. Implementing much-needed reforms will also free government resources to focus on pressing national security matters. For example, current rules require the Department of Homeland Security to renew the Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) of hundreds of thousands of legal immigrants each year as those immigrants wait for green cards and permanent residency in the U.S. Rather than renew these EADs annually, the government could renew these documents every three years, freeing countless hours that could be better spent serving the Department's mission.

    The greatest impact of the broken green card process is borne by the legal immigrants and their families. There are more than half million highly-skilled legal immigrants already working productively in the United States who find themselves trapped in a system that is taking years longer than intended. During this wait for a green card, these immigrants remain trapped in a legal maze, unable to change jobs - even within the same employer - without starting the arduous immigration process over again, and subject to waits that grow longer and longer.

    We implore you to exercise your authority to implement administratively these much-needed reforms.
    Recapture administratively the unused visas for permanent residency to fulfill the congressional mandate of 140,000 green cards per year.
    Revise the administrative definition of "same or similar" to allow slight additional job flexibility for legal immigrants awaiting adjudication of adjustment of status (I-485) petitions.
    Allow filing of Adjustment of Status (Form I-485) when a visa number is not available.
    Implement the existing interim rule to allow issuance of multi-year Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) and Advance Parole.
    Allow visa revalidation in the United States.
    Reinstate premium processing of Immigrant Petitions.
    I earnestly urge you to implement these administrative remedies without delay, otherwise many immigrant families who came to USA legally to become a part of the “American Dream”, will continue to stay in a limbo. Your help is urgently needed. Your action will also fulfill your stated goal of attracting and retaining highly-skilled legal immigrants from around the world, eliminating bureaucratic inefficiency, and improving the lives of future Americans already living and working legally in the United States.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    Respectfully,





    <<Full Name>>
    <<Address>>
    <<Phone Number>>





    . %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • sledge_hammer
    06-23 04:56 PM
    I am going to put (c)(9) for both me and my wife.


    What did you put in for the question 16 (Last Question) ? is it c9?



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • willwin
    09-16 12:27 PM
    PLEASE CALL NOW!





    2010 %IMG_DESC_3% . %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • SAPGURU
    07-11 03:31 PM
    http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/44667/immigrants-refused-green-cards-take-to-gandhigiri.html



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • royus77
    06-20 05:15 PM
    please clear the doubt .. Affidavit of support is it I-134 or 864?


    Its I-134 document





    hair %IMG_DESC_4% . %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • check_rd
    06-24 03:01 AM
    Mine case is labor 06/2002 EB3, I-140 approved.
    Spouse labor priority date is 06/2007 EB2, I-140 needs to be applied.

    Acoording to my lawyer one cannot have 2 I-485's and though i explained that no such return rule he said its a risk and will get RFE and delays and personally does not recommend.

    I am going to check with my wife lawyer on Monday and its well reputed law firm.

    Since we both have stable jobs i am probably going to opt for my I-485 which has been already been filed and just file I-140 for my wife's case. Any thoughts ?



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • abhis0
    09-26 02:38 PM
    This is the same draft (I just changed the Dear.... senator./congressman/USCIS Assistant Inspector) for each and every email I sent out.
    Congressmen& Senator needs faxed copies with Date and Sign on it.
    Yes the same to the USCIS dept also. I got replies from Senator and Congressmen.. but nothing coming out of USCIS tight lips.

    Did congressman or senator's response sound pomising? I called up USCIS and same old response no data for ur application in our system...





    hot %IMG_DESC_5% . %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • grupak
    03-26 11:39 AM
    Right but the here problem is that how to come up with written evidence of discrimination? These jerks do not send you an email "Hey, we do not consider EAD". Their pattern is generally as under.


    I understand. For an analogy consider theft. You might not know who did it but you lodge a complaint with the police. Its their job to investigate. Sometimes they are successful, sometimes they are not.

    In this case if the govt gets lot of complaints, and find a pattern they will investigate and find the dirt.

    All I and a few others are saying, discriminating EADs is illegal, and there is a govt. agency to deal with these things. So, if anybody is a victim contact the govt. agency. By being quite we are not helping ourselves.



    more...


    house %IMG_DESC_17% . %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • jungalee43
    09-14 03:51 PM
    My colleagues and friends are sending e-mails to Judiciary committee members. I am preparing draft for this mail. I am going to divide this mail into sections. One section describing what H.R. 5882 is (recapture, justice against discriminatory treatment based on country of birth, USCIS efficiency) and another sections would describe what it is not (not amnesty, not an increase in numbers). I want a link to the testimony given by USCIS director in congress confirming the wastage of green cards. Can someone quickly direct me to that link?





    tattoo %IMG_DESC_6% . %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • hopeforgcfast
    08-17 02:18 PM
    Due to the pending caseload at NSC, the processing time of your I485 application has been extended. Allow extra time for an officer to review your application. Furthermore if all intial evidence was not included with your application or a question arose during adjudication that required a RFE additional time would be needed.
    Your application remains awaiting review by an Officer and you will be notified as soon as decision is made. The service is waiting for VISA availability


    got this message for my wifes SR opened on 07/30, did anyone got the same response?


    I got the same reply to my SR.



    more...


    pictures %IMG_DESC_7% . %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • gc_on_demand
    09-09 02:41 PM
    bump





    dresses %IMG_DESC_12% . %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • suriajay12
    03-10 09:01 PM
    BTW guys,

    Thanks for those who think the idea has merit.
    i suddenly see a red dot against my username for trying to think out of the box:
    "please dont be foolish and waste everyones time with ur insane proposal? thanks"

    It is OK - whoever wanted to go this length. FYI, 'have been a member of IV and a donor since inception. Is anyone from the core who thinks this idea is insane?

    Like-minded folks - let us work on it
    How about having a list of action items and getting an opinion from the IV core on them?

    Who is thinking your idea is bad or your intentions.. dont worry about these reds. I got 7 recently, but people who see your point will give u a green and that will go off.. Dont spoil your mind.. and give us more ideas.. how do I give you a green.. can someone show me..
    I think I just figured out and gave u a green..



    more...


    makeup %IMG_DESC_9% . %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • factoryman
    06-29 08:37 PM
    My new theory is the DOS was influenced by politicians who are attorneys (I beleive that there 50% of lawmakers) and it released a huge Visa Numbers. The politicians have strong connections to law firms. The USCIS doesn't want to do it, because it doesn't have 'resources', 'money', 'manpower. So, they are on a near strike mode, not attending routine works like sending receipts., etc in a timely fashion.

    If it is any consoling to you, this is what I posted yesterday at a different thread at IV. Looks like I can re-cycle it today for a larger audience. Click the hyperlink and see the video for yourself.
    A strong case of moronic president, moronic problems?

    ...........
    ................

    Many issues are being swept under the carpet. I had written a few times earlier. The backlog and GC issues are not truly a numbers game. It is the neo-con regime and the republican culture that had engulfed Washington, its consequences, that had made things miserable for us; we, the legal immigrants.

    4/5ths of the illegal immigrants have been here by the time of Clinton's second term. It was a non-issue then. You should understand why is it an issue now? Why can't it the legal and illegal immigration be addressed and solved. In a democracy, things like this can be solved administratively, legislatively and judicially. Adminstratively, we we hit below the belt, in backlogs, in delays, in sudden rule changes (no concurrent filings of PD is not current). Legislatively, they are stalling and falling apart. What is left for the immigrants?

    I had written many times earlier.

    Why should you know? Why should you understand? It is in your own interests that you understand things wisely. Failure to know what is happening on the ground, what is happening around us is a sure shot for personal failure.

    In this connection, see a counter-point on the immigration bill.

    http://www.newscorpse.com/Pix/Caps/cavuto-chong2

    See the Entire Video here (http://media2.foxnews.com/062807/062807_cav_chong2_300.wmv)

    here is my theory.

    DOS and USCIS played a tactical move by making all the visa numbers current in anticipation of the CIR bill so that the legals wont complain to the senators about retrogression.

    Once the CIR went down the drain, they are panicking about the outcome of their tactical error and trying to undo that move.

    Again, just my theory...:confused:





    girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14% . %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • rajuseattle
    04-06 12:23 AM
    GC_info:

    YOU can apply her AP with the instructions to deliver the AP to nearby US consulate in India. Upon AP approval, she can go and collect her AP from the consulate and come back using AP.





    hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11% . %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • cram
    06-21 02:08 AM
    Thanks for your reply, raj2007. My employer better hire me because my GC would be dependent on that :) What is RFC?





    logiclife
    06-15 02:34 PM
    June 15, 2007

    United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
    Vermont Service Center
    75 Lower Welden Street
    St. Albans, VT 05479

    RE: Job Letter for Mr. ______________

    Dear Sir or Madam:

    This is to certify that _____________ will provide Mr. __________ full-time permanent employment as a _____________ at an annual salary of $___________ upon becoming a Permanent Resident of the United States.

    This letter is being issued in connection with an Application for Adjustment of Status being filed on his behalf.

    Sincerely,

    I think it has to be a little more than that.

    The job description should be there in this letter that should match the labor cert (mostly if not exactly).





    indio0617
    07-09 06:39 PM
    This is perfect. It will drag more media attention!!!

    Yes Guys. Keep it up. The message will be LOUD and CLEAR now. Make sure that all of you communicate this to the media, whoever you talk to.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
     
    Copyright © 2010 | Tempat Judul Blog| Privacy Policy